SSuccess PhilosophySUCCESSPHILOSOPHY.JP

Q051

4択Multiple choice基礎Basic
水平思考・創造的思考lateral thinking · creative thinking
Edward de Bono が提唱した「水平思考(ラテラルシンキング)」の特徴として最も適切なものはどれですか。Which statement best describes lateral thinking as proposed by Edward de Bono?
  1. 既存の前提を一段ずつ論理的に深掘りし、唯一の正解に到達する思考法である
  2. 問題の前提そのものを疑い、意図的に視点を横にずらして複数の選択肢を生み出す思考法である
  3. 専門家の判断を優先し、経験則に基づいて素早く結論を出す思考法である
  4. データを大量に集め、統計的に最も頻度の高い答えを採用する思考法である
  1. A method of drilling logically into existing assumptions step by step to reach the single correct answer
  2. A method of questioning the premises themselves and deliberately shifting perspective sideways to generate multiple options
  3. A method of prioritizing expert judgment and reaching quick conclusions based on rules of thumb
  4. A method of gathering large amounts of data and adopting the statistically most frequent answer

解答Answer

正解: BCorrect: B

水平思考は前提を疑い、視点を横にずらして多様な選択肢を生む思考法です。垂直思考(論理的深掘り)を補完する役割を持ちます。Lateral thinking questions premises and shifts perspective sideways to generate diverse options. It complements vertical (logical, in-depth) thinking rather than replacing it.

解説Explanation

de Bono は1967年の著書で、既存の枠組みの中を論理的に掘り下げる「垂直思考」に対し、枠組みそのものを動かす「水平思考」を提唱しました。ランダムな刺激語を使う、前提を逆転させる、極端な条件を仮定するなどの技法が知られています。選択肢Aは垂直思考の説明であり、Cは直観的判断、Dは統計的な多数決に近く、いずれも「新しい選択肢を生む」という水平思考の本質から外れています。例えば航空会社が「座席の快適さ」で競うのをやめ、「移動の速さと低価格」に価値を再定義した格安航空モデルは、前提をずらした水平思考の実例といえます。In his 1967 book, de Bono contrasted vertical thinking, which digs logically within an existing frame, with lateral thinking, which moves the frame itself. Well-known techniques include random-word stimulation, reversing assumptions, and imagining extreme conditions. Option A describes vertical thinking, C describes intuitive expert judgment, and D describes a statistical majority approach; none captures the essence of generating genuinely new options. A practical example is the low-cost airline model, which stopped competing on seat comfort and redefined value as speed and low price, a classic sideways move of the premise. De Bono stressed that lateral thinking is a learnable skill, not a talent reserved for a creative few.

課題Issue

水平思考は発想の量を増やしますが、質の評価や実行可能性の検証を伴わないと「面白いだけのアイデア」で終わりがちです。また会議で唐突に前提を覆すと、周囲から現実逃避や単なる思いつきと受け取られる場合もあります。Lateral thinking increases the quantity of ideas, but without evaluation and feasibility checks it often ends in ideas that are merely interesting. Abruptly overturning assumptions in a meeting can also be perceived by colleagues as escapism, especially in organizations that reward incremental, defensible proposals over unconventional ones that carry personal risk.

改善案Improvement

発散(水平思考)と収束(垂直思考)の時間を明確に分け、発散フェーズでは批判を禁止し、収束フェーズで実現性・コスト・効果の基準で絞り込みます。生まれたアイデアは小さな実験で検証してから本格投資に進みます。Separate divergent (lateral) and convergent (vertical) phases explicitly: ban criticism during divergence, then filter by feasibility, cost, and impact during convergence. Test the surviving ideas with small experiments before committing major resources, and give the team a shared vocabulary so that lateral moves are recognized as deliberate technique rather than distraction.